Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Vericel Corporation vs BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotech Cost Efficiency: Vericel vs. BioCryst

__timestampBioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Vericel Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201412200017293000
Thursday, January 1, 2015189600026470000
Friday, January 1, 2016269900028307000
Sunday, January 1, 2017170200030354000
Monday, January 1, 201847100032160000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019410100037571000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020167600039951000
Friday, January 1, 2021726400050159000
Saturday, January 1, 2022659400054577000
Sunday, January 1, 2023466100061940000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

A Tale of Two Biotech Companies: Cost of Revenue Efficiency

In the competitive world of biotechnology, cost efficiency is a critical factor for success. This analysis compares the cost of revenue efficiency between Vericel Corporation and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Vericel Corporation consistently demonstrated superior cost management, with its cost of revenue peaking at approximately $61.94 million in 2023, a significant increase from $17.29 million in 2014. In contrast, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. showed a more volatile pattern, with costs ranging from a low of $122,000 in 2014 to a high of $7.26 million in 2021. Vericel's strategic cost management has allowed it to maintain a competitive edge, with its cost of revenue growing at a steady rate, reflecting robust operational efficiency. This comparison highlights the importance of cost control in sustaining growth and competitiveness in the biotech industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025