__timestamp | ADMA Biologics, Inc. | HUTCHMED (China) Limited |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 9517014 | 33472000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 7015946 | 47368000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 7688238 | 66871000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 6229587 | 50675000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 3926120 | 78821000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 2343848 | 91944000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 5907013 | 111234000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 3646060 | 207447000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 3613764 | 267587000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 3300000 | 303055000 |
Unleashing insights
In the ever-evolving landscape of biotechnology and pharmaceuticals, research and development (R&D) spending is a critical indicator of a company's commitment to innovation. Over the past decade, ADMA Biologics, Inc. and HUTCHMED (China) Limited have demonstrated contrasting approaches to R&D investment.
ADMA Biologics, Inc. has shown a steady decline in R&D expenses, dropping from approximately $9.5 million in 2014 to around $3.3 million in 2023. This represents a significant reduction of over 65%, suggesting a strategic shift or resource reallocation.
Conversely, HUTCHMED (China) Limited has consistently increased its R&D spending, growing from $33 million in 2014 to a staggering $303 million in 2023. This nearly tenfold increase underscores the company's aggressive pursuit of innovation and market leadership.
These trends highlight the diverse strategies companies employ in the competitive biotech sector, reflecting their unique visions and market positions.
Comparing Innovation Spending: Merck & Co., Inc. and ADMA Biologics, Inc.
Analyzing R&D Budgets: Amgen Inc. vs HUTCHMED (China) Limited
Comparing Innovation Spending: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and HUTCHMED (China) Limited
Who Prioritizes Innovation? R&D Spending Compared for Viatris Inc. and ADMA Biologics, Inc.
Comparing Innovation Spending: Viatris Inc. and HUTCHMED (China) Limited
R&D Spending Showdown: BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. vs HUTCHMED (China) Limited
Comparing Innovation Spending: Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and HUTCHMED (China) Limited
Opthea Limited vs HUTCHMED (China) Limited: Strategic Focus on R&D Spending
Who Prioritizes Innovation? R&D Spending Compared for Verona Pharma plc and HUTCHMED (China) Limited
Who Prioritizes Innovation? R&D Spending Compared for ADMA Biologics, Inc. and Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.
Research and Development: Comparing Key Metrics for ADMA Biologics, Inc. and Viridian Therapeutics, Inc.
Research and Development Expenses Breakdown: Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. vs HUTCHMED (China) Limited