Comparing Innovation Spending: Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotech R&D: Gilead vs. Catalyst's Innovation Strategies

__timestampCatalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014101177742854000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015118013423014000000
Friday, January 1, 2016113699415098000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017113752373734000000
Monday, January 1, 2018199192045018000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019188427529106000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020164967155039000000
Friday, January 1, 2021169360005363000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022197890004977000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023931500006923000000
Monday, January 1, 20245907000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Innovation Spending: A Tale of Two Biotech Giants

In the ever-evolving world of biotechnology, research and development (R&D) spending is a key indicator of a company's commitment to innovation. Over the past decade, Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to R&D investment. From 2014 to 2023, Gilead Sciences consistently allocated substantial resources, with R&D expenses peaking at approximately $6.9 billion in 2023, reflecting a 142% increase from 2014. In contrast, Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, while showing a significant jump in 2023 with $93 million, has maintained a more modest R&D budget, averaging around $23 million annually. This disparity highlights Gilead's aggressive pursuit of groundbreaking therapies, while Catalyst adopts a more focused strategy. As the biotech landscape continues to shift, these spending patterns offer insights into each company's strategic priorities and potential future breakthroughs.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025