Comparing Innovation Spending: Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Novavax, Inc.

Biotech R&D: Gilead's Steady vs. Novavax's Reactive Spending

__timestampGilead Sciences, Inc.Novavax, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014285400000079435000
Thursday, January 1, 20153014000000162644000
Friday, January 1, 20165098000000237939000
Sunday, January 1, 20173734000000168435000
Monday, January 1, 20185018000000173797000
Tuesday, January 1, 20199106000000113842000
Wednesday, January 1, 20205039000000747027000
Friday, January 1, 202153630000002534508000
Saturday, January 1, 202249770000001235278000
Sunday, January 1, 20236923000000737502000
Monday, January 1, 20245907000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Innovation in Biotech: A Tale of Two Companies

In the ever-evolving world of biotechnology, research and development (R&D) spending is a key indicator of a company's commitment to innovation. Over the past decade, Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Novavax, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to R&D investment. From 2014 to 2023, Gilead consistently outspent Novavax, with its R&D expenses peaking in 2019 at nearly three times its 2014 levels. In contrast, Novavax's R&D spending surged dramatically in 2021, reaching a peak that was over 30 times its 2014 expenditure, likely driven by the global demand for COVID-19 vaccines. This stark difference highlights Gilead's steady investment strategy versus Novavax's reactive approach to market demands. As the biotech landscape continues to shift, these spending patterns offer valuable insights into each company's strategic priorities and their potential impact on future innovations.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025