Comparing Innovation Spending: Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. and ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Biotech R&D: ACADIA vs. Halozyme's Spending Strategies

__timestampACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20146060200079696000
Thursday, January 1, 20157386900093236000
Friday, January 1, 201699284000150842000
Sunday, January 1, 2017149189000150643000
Monday, January 1, 2018187163000150252000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019240385000140804000
Wednesday, January 1, 202031913000034236000
Friday, January 1, 202123941500035672000
Saturday, January 1, 202236157500066607000
Sunday, January 1, 202335161900076363000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Innovation Spending: A Tale of Two Biotech Companies

In the competitive world of biotechnology, research and development (R&D) spending is a key indicator of a company's commitment to innovation. Over the past decade, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to R&D investment. From 2014 to 2023, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals increased its R&D expenses by nearly 480%, peaking in 2022 with a 361% rise compared to 2014. In contrast, Halozyme Therapeutics saw a more modest increase of approximately 4% over the same period, with a notable dip in 2020. This divergence highlights ACADIA's aggressive pursuit of new therapies, while Halozyme appears to adopt a more conservative strategy. As the biotech landscape evolves, these spending patterns may influence each company's ability to innovate and capture market share. Understanding these trends provides valuable insights into the strategic priorities of these industry players.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025