Comparing Revenue Performance: Gilead Sciences, Inc. or BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.?

Gilead vs. BioCryst: A Decade of Revenue Dynamics

__timestampBioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141360800024890000000
Thursday, January 1, 20154825700032639000000
Friday, January 1, 20162635300030390000000
Sunday, January 1, 20172518600026107000000
Monday, January 1, 20182065300022127000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194883500022449000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201781200024689000000
Friday, January 1, 202115717000027305000000
Saturday, January 1, 202227082700027281000000
Sunday, January 1, 202333141200027116000000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

A Tale of Two Biotechs: Gilead Sciences vs. BioCryst Pharmaceuticals

In the competitive world of biotechnology, revenue performance is a key indicator of success. Over the past decade, Gilead Sciences, Inc. and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have showcased contrasting financial trajectories. Gilead Sciences, a giant in the industry, consistently reported revenues exceeding $20 billion annually since 2014, peaking at approximately $32.6 billion in 2015. In contrast, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, a smaller player, has seen its revenue grow from a modest $13.6 million in 2014 to an impressive $331 million by 2023, marking a staggering increase of over 2300%.

While Gilead's revenue has remained relatively stable, BioCryst's growth trajectory highlights its potential in the biotech sector. This comparison underscores the diverse strategies and market positions within the industry, offering insights into how different companies navigate the complex landscape of pharmaceutical innovation.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025