Comparing SG&A Expenses: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. vs The Trade Desk, Inc. Trends and Insights

AMD vs. TTD: SG&A Expense Trends Over a Decade

__timestampAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc.The Trade Desk, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201459900000023975000
Thursday, January 1, 201548200000040070000
Friday, January 1, 201646600000078219000
Sunday, January 1, 2017516000000119825000
Monday, January 1, 2018562000000171981000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019750000000275930000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020995000000346359000
Friday, January 1, 20211448000000623959000
Saturday, January 1, 20222336000000863142000
Sunday, January 1, 20232352000000968248000
Monday, January 1, 202427830000001082333000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

SG&A Expenses: A Tale of Two Tech Giants

A Decade of Financial Evolution

Over the past decade, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) and The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) have showcased intriguing trends in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, AMD's SG&A expenses surged by nearly 293%, reflecting its aggressive growth and market expansion strategies. In contrast, The Trade Desk experienced a staggering 3,937% increase, underscoring its rapid ascent in the digital advertising space.

Key Insights and Trends

In 2014, AMD's SG&A expenses were approximately 25 times higher than The Trade Desk's. However, by 2023, this gap narrowed significantly, with AMD's expenses only about 2.4 times higher. This shift highlights The Trade Desk's remarkable growth trajectory. Both companies have shown resilience and adaptability, navigating the ever-evolving tech landscape with strategic investments in their operational frameworks.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025