Comparing SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Teradyne, Inc. Trends and Insights

SG&A Expense Trends: Applied Materials vs. Teradyne

__timestampApplied Materials, Inc.Teradyne, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014890000000319713000
Thursday, January 1, 2015897000000306313000
Friday, January 1, 2016819000000315682000
Sunday, January 1, 2017890000000348287000
Monday, January 1, 20181002000000390669000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019982000000437083000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201093000000464769000
Friday, January 1, 20211229000000547559000
Saturday, January 1, 20221438000000558103000
Sunday, January 1, 20231628000000571426000
Monday, January 1, 202417970000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

A Decade of SG&A Trends: Applied Materials vs. Teradyne

In the ever-evolving semiconductor industry, understanding the financial dynamics of key players is crucial. Over the past decade, Applied Materials, Inc. and Teradyne, Inc. have shown distinct trends in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, Applied Materials' SG&A expenses surged by approximately 102%, reflecting strategic investments and expansion efforts. In contrast, Teradyne's expenses grew by about 79% over the same period, indicating a more conservative approach.

Key Insights

  • 2014-2018: Both companies maintained steady growth, with Applied Materials consistently outspending Teradyne by a ratio of nearly 3:1.
  • 2019-2023: Applied Materials' expenses accelerated, peaking at nearly double their 2014 levels, while Teradyne's growth plateaued, suggesting a potential shift in operational strategies.

These trends highlight the contrasting financial strategies of these industry giants, offering valuable insights for investors and analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025