Comparing SG&A Expenses: Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated vs ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. Trends and Insights

Biopharma SG&A Trends: ACADIA vs. Corcept

__timestampACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated
Wednesday, January 1, 20143274800034916000
Thursday, January 1, 20159080400036949000
Friday, January 1, 201618645600045240000
Sunday, January 1, 201725506200062416000
Monday, January 1, 201826575800081289000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019325638000100359000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020388661000105326000
Friday, January 1, 2021396028000122356000
Saturday, January 1, 2022369090000152848000
Sunday, January 1, 2023402466000184259000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

SG&A Expenses: A Tale of Two Biopharma Companies

In the competitive landscape of biopharmaceuticals, understanding the financial strategies of key players is crucial. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated and ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals has consistently outpaced Corcept Therapeutics in SG&A spending, with a notable increase of approximately 1,130% from 2014 to 2023. In contrast, Corcept Therapeutics saw a more modest rise of around 428% in the same timeframe. This disparity highlights ACADIA's aggressive investment in administrative and sales functions, potentially reflecting a strategy focused on rapid market expansion. Meanwhile, Corcept's more conservative approach may indicate a focus on cost efficiency. These trends offer valuable insights into the strategic priorities of these companies as they navigate the evolving biopharma landscape.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025