Comparing SG&A Expenses: Genmab A/S vs Summit Therapeutics Inc. Trends and Insights

Biotech SG&A Expenses: Genmab vs. Summit

__timestampGenmab A/SSummit Therapeutics Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014795290006795238
Thursday, January 1, 2015912240007454247
Friday, January 1, 201610241300010345862
Sunday, January 1, 201714698700016984203
Monday, January 1, 201821369500016187290
Tuesday, January 1, 20193420000009299233.54
Wednesday, January 1, 202066100000019232000
Friday, January 1, 2021128300000023611000
Saturday, January 1, 2022267600000026700000
Sunday, January 1, 2023329700000028215000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

SG&A Expenses: A Tale of Two Biotech Companies

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing operational costs is crucial for success. This chart provides a fascinating comparison of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses between Genmab A/S and Summit Therapeutics Inc. over the past decade.

Genmab A/S: A Steady Climb

From 2014 to 2023, Genmab A/S has seen a staggering increase in SG&A expenses, growing by over 4,000%. This reflects the company's aggressive expansion and investment in its operational infrastructure. By 2023, Genmab's SG&A expenses reached a peak, highlighting its commitment to scaling its operations.

Summit Therapeutics Inc.: A More Modest Growth

In contrast, Summit Therapeutics Inc. experienced a more modest increase of approximately 315% in the same period. This suggests a more conservative approach to managing operational costs, possibly focusing on strategic investments.

This comparison underscores the diverse strategies employed by biotech firms in managing their growth and operational expenses.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025