Comparing SG&A Expenses: Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. vs RB Global, Inc. Trends and Insights

SG&A Expenses: A Decade of Divergence

__timestampRB Global, Inc.Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20142482200002595900000
Thursday, January 1, 20152549900002486400000
Friday, January 1, 20162835290002623900000
Sunday, January 1, 20173232700002980100000
Monday, January 1, 20183826760003171700000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193823890003041000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20204175230003089600000
Friday, January 1, 20214645990003240400000
Saturday, January 1, 20225399330003370000000
Sunday, January 1, 20237437000002829300000
Monday, January 1, 20247739000003310500000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

SG&A Expenses: A Tale of Two Giants

In the world of corporate finance, Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses are a critical measure of a company's operational efficiency. Over the past decade, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and RB Global, Inc. have showcased contrasting trends in their SG&A expenses.

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

From 2014 to 2023, Stanley Black & Decker's SG&A expenses have remained relatively stable, peaking in 2022 with a 30% increase from 2014. However, 2023 saw a notable decline, dropping by approximately 16% from the previous year.

RB Global, Inc.

Conversely, RB Global, Inc. has experienced a more dynamic trajectory. Starting at a modest level in 2014, their SG&A expenses surged by nearly 200% by 2023, reflecting aggressive expansion and strategic investments.

These trends highlight the diverse strategies and market responses of these industry leaders, offering valuable insights for investors and analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025