Comparing SG&A Expenses: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited vs Pure Storage, Inc. Trends and Insights

SG&A Expenses: TSMC vs. Pure Storage - A Decade of Growth

__timestampPure Storage, Inc.Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
Wednesday, January 1, 20146065200024020800000
Thursday, January 1, 201518467400022921900000
Friday, January 1, 201631597600025696400000
Sunday, January 1, 201744468700027169200000
Monday, January 1, 201857520000026253700000
Tuesday, January 1, 201972161700028085800000
Wednesday, January 1, 202089117500035570400000
Friday, January 1, 202189849100044488200000
Saturday, January 1, 202298898200063445300000
Sunday, January 1, 2023112160500071464000000
Monday, January 1, 2024119726400096889000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

SG&A Expenses: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding the financial strategies of industry leaders is crucial. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two prominent companies: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSMC) and Pure Storage, Inc. Over the past decade, TSMC has consistently outpaced Pure Storage in SG&A spending, reflecting its expansive global operations and market dominance. In 2023, TSMC's SG&A expenses surged to nearly 97% higher than in 2014, showcasing its aggressive growth strategy. Meanwhile, Pure Storage, a rising star in data storage solutions, has seen its SG&A expenses grow by approximately 1,870% since 2014, indicating its rapid expansion and increasing market presence. This comparison not only highlights the contrasting scales of these companies but also underscores the diverse strategies employed in the tech industry to maintain competitive edges.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025