Comparing SG&A Expenses: Viking Therapeutics, Inc. vs Celldex Therapeutics, Inc. Trends and Insights

Biotech SG&A Expenses: Viking vs. Celldex

__timestampCelldex Therapeutics, Inc.Viking Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014206220001244910
Thursday, January 1, 2015338370005029636
Friday, January 1, 2016359790004846776
Sunday, January 1, 2017250030005329003
Monday, January 1, 2018192690007121000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019154260009128000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201445600010731000
Friday, January 1, 20212048800010701000
Saturday, January 1, 20222719500016121000
Sunday, January 1, 20233091400037021000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

SG&A Expenses: A Tale of Two Biotech Companies

In the dynamic world of biotechnology, understanding financial trends is crucial for investors and stakeholders. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two prominent biotech firms: Viking Therapeutics, Inc. and Celldex Therapeutics, Inc., from 2014 to 2023.

Key Insights

Over the past decade, Celldex Therapeutics has consistently maintained higher SG&A expenses compared to Viking Therapeutics. Notably, in 2023, Celldex's expenses surged by approximately 13% from the previous year, reaching a peak of $30.9 million. In contrast, Viking Therapeutics experienced a dramatic increase of over 130% in the same period, culminating in $37 million.

Trends and Implications

The data reveals a significant shift in Viking's financial strategy, possibly indicating aggressive expansion or increased operational activities. Meanwhile, Celldex's steady expenditure suggests a more stable approach. These trends offer valuable insights into each company's strategic priorities and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025