Comparison of Average SG&A Expense Ratio for AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and GlaxoSmithKline Over the Years

SG&A Expense Ratios: AstraZeneca, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline

__timestampAZNGSKPFE
Tuesday, January 1, 198500
Wednesday, January 1, 198600
Thursday, January 1, 198700
Friday, January 1, 198800
Sunday, January 1, 198900
Monday, January 1, 199000
Tuesday, January 1, 199100
Wednesday, January 1, 199200
Friday, January 1, 1993000
Saturday, January 1, 1994000.6747382391896248
Sunday, January 1, 19950.0855726326227069900.6353398708596617
Monday, January 1, 1996000.5737122102643462
Wednesday, January 1, 1997000.5648333712048154
Thursday, January 1, 19980.068821096173733190.085899903753609240.6002351852456729
Friday, January 1, 19990.146500599289360320.085120498657697410.6015936371892134
Saturday, January 1, 20000.22792473571080850.29270585830414520.44540002996333106
Monday, January 1, 20010.251877570326694670.369488101371919450.2544847401006039
Tuesday, January 1, 20020.346253253546776440.282574570708641840.1685713934658081
Wednesday, January 1, 20030.37211139431496330.35349788876224963-0.0018275203188159068
Thursday, January 1, 20040.38555519401980620.347074177866691150
Saturday, January 1, 20050.37057714111708760.16177179465563205-0.025582980780997883
Sunday, January 1, 20060.350618813094174030.159415635599725210.30987338187984625
Monday, January 1, 2007-0.00269170675330446250.073810374073743410.23034188034188033
Tuesday, January 1, 2008-0.00087976440622038190.3135422303059674-0.005619025835814943
Thursday, January 1, 20090.344005092790370950.33680722176629385-0.003760116019840767
Friday, January 1, 20100.31514437401648330.4592105774845373-0.00409136445130711
Saturday, January 1, 20110.331868015301345850.32271253295365354-0.0079963784886228
Sunday, January 1, 20120.083718873316097430.33077549194607270.15324885339811953
Tuesday, January 1, 20130.47028882821763550.319900981771972240.02124207110193244
Wednesday, January 1, 20140.49713636836335090.35849898266151910.01680896478121665
Thursday, January 1, 20150.449988002952543150.38647865142643284-0.000021091706740909473
Friday, January 1, 20160.16745441212809170.336377701621419670.000019164430816404752
Sunday, January 1, 20170.456461649584576970.320733098275663430.026472305334598264
Monday, January 1, 201800.32200556052061660.01622424155695478
Tuesday, January 1, 201900.337510808391528-0.00008512974329802359
Wednesday, January 1, 202000.33666033183617880.0001258232822930654
Friday, January 1, 20210.0475813837315793850.32184095319665990.022065609531000924
Saturday, January 1, 20220.097363868147878340.295527370910011740.018979003705228488
Sunday, January 1, 20230.019023584108233140.30966903003098810.013632535616534493
Monday, January 1, 20240.371543832433117670.3567971214591880
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

A Comparative Analysis of SG&A Expense Ratios for AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and GlaxoSmithKline

Historical Overview

The pharmaceutical industry has always been a battleground for innovation, market share, and financial efficiency. One key metric that offers insight into a company's operational efficiency is the Sales, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expense ratio. This ratio measures the percentage of revenue that is consumed by these overhead costs. In this analysis, we delve into the SG&A expense ratios of three pharmaceutical giants: AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and GlaxoSmithKline, spanning several decades.

Key Insights

AstraZeneca (AZN)

AstraZeneca's SG&A expense ratio has shown significant fluctuations over the years. Notably, in 2004, the ratio peaked at approximately 38.6%, indicating a substantial portion of revenue being allocated to overhead costs. However, the company has also experienced periods of lower ratios, such as in 2008, where the ratio was nearly zero, suggesting efficient cost management during that year.

Pfizer (PFE)

Pfizer's SG&A expense ratio has been relatively volatile. In 1994, the ratio was as high as 67.5%, but it saw a dramatic decrease in subsequent years. By 2003, the ratio had dropped to nearly zero, reflecting a period of high operational efficiency. However, the ratio has seen negative values in some years, indicating potential accounting adjustments or extraordinary items.

GlaxoSmithKline (GSK)

GlaxoSmithKline has maintained a more stable SG&A expense ratio compared to its peers. The ratio has generally hovered around 20-30%, with a notable peak in 2001 at approximately 37%. This stability suggests consistent cost management practices over the years.

Conclusion

Understanding the SG&A expense ratios of these pharmaceutical giants provides valuable insights into their operational efficiencies and financial health. While AstraZeneca and Pfizer have shown more volatility, GlaxoSmithKline's stable ratios highlight its consistent approach to managing overhead costs. This comparative analysis underscores the importance of efficient cost management in maintaining a competitive edge in the pharmaceutical industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
6 Sept 2024