__timestamp | Global Payments Inc. | Honeywell International Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 1022107000 | 28957000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 1147639000 | 26747000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 1603532000 | 27150000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 1928037000 | 27575000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1095014000 | 29046000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 2073803000 | 24339000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 3650727000 | 22169000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 3773725000 | 23394000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 3778617000 | 23825000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 3727521000 | 22995000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 3760116000 | 23836000000 |
Cracking the code
In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding cost structures is pivotal. Honeywell International Inc. and Global Payments Inc. offer a fascinating study in contrasts. Over the past decade, Honeywell's cost of revenue has shown a slight decline, dropping approximately 20% from 2014 to 2023. This trend reflects strategic cost management and operational efficiency. In contrast, Global Payments Inc. has experienced a significant increase, with costs nearly quadrupling over the same period, indicating aggressive expansion and scaling efforts.
This analysis underscores the diverse strategies of these industry giants, offering valuable insights for investors and analysts alike.
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Honeywell International Inc. and Rockwell Automation, Inc.
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Honeywell International Inc. and Xylem Inc.
Honeywell International Inc. vs HEICO Corporation: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Honeywell International Inc. and Dover Corporation
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Honeywell International Inc. and Lennox International Inc.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Honeywell International Inc. vs Global Payments Inc. Trends and Insights
A Professional Review of EBITDA: Honeywell International Inc. Compared to Global Payments Inc.