__timestamp | Bausch Health Companies Inc. | Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 2254600000 | 21226345 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 2645000000 | 139626 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 2611000000 | 93831530 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 2548000000 | 79419009 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 2351000000 | 368673 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 2350000000 | 477121 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 2249000000 | 1895029 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 2394000000 | 8034589 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 2364000000 | 20443000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 2559000000 | 33745000 |
Unleashing the power of data
In the ever-evolving landscape of pharmaceuticals, understanding cost structures is pivotal. Bausch Health Companies Inc. and Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. offer a fascinating study in contrasts. From 2014 to 2023, Bausch Health's cost of revenue has shown a relatively stable trend, averaging around $2.4 billion annually. This consistency underscores their robust market presence and operational efficiency. In contrast, Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. has experienced a dramatic rise in costs, with a staggering 1,500% increase from 2015 to 2023. This surge reflects their aggressive expansion and investment in innovative therapies.
While Bausch Health maintains a steady course, Intra-Cellular's escalating costs highlight their growth trajectory. Investors and stakeholders should consider these dynamics when evaluating potential opportunities in the pharmaceutical sector. The data reveals not just numbers, but the strategic directions of these industry players.
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Novo Nordisk A/S and Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: AbbVie Inc. and Bausch Health Companies Inc.
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Merck & Co., Inc. and Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.
GSK plc vs Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
GSK plc vs Bausch Health Companies Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. and Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. vs Alkermes plc: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. vs MiMedx Group, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Perrigo Company plc and Bausch Health Companies Inc.
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Bausch Health Companies Inc. vs Wave Life Sciences Ltd.
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Bausch Health Companies Inc. vs Evotec SE