__timestamp | Comfort Systems USA, Inc. | Snap-on Incorporated |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 1161024000 | 1693400000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 1262390000 | 1704500000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 1290331000 | 1720800000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 1421641000 | 1862000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1736600000 | 1870700000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 2113334000 | 1886000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 2309676000 | 1844000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 2510429000 | 2141200000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 3398756000 | 2311700000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 4216251000 | 2488500000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 2329500000 |
Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data
In the ever-evolving landscape of industrial and service sectors, understanding cost dynamics is crucial. Snap-on Incorporated and Comfort Systems USA, Inc. offer a fascinating study in contrasts. Over the past decade, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. has seen its cost of revenue soar by approximately 263%, from $1.16 billion in 2014 to $4.22 billion in 2023. This reflects a robust expansion in their operations and market reach. Meanwhile, Snap-on Incorporated has experienced a more modest increase of about 47% in the same period, indicating a steady yet controlled growth strategy.
The data reveals that Comfort Systems USA, Inc. has consistently outpaced Snap-on in terms of cost growth, particularly in the last five years. This trend underscores the aggressive scaling and investment in infrastructure by Comfort Systems, contrasting with Snap-on's focus on efficiency and cost management. Such insights are invaluable for investors and industry analysts alike.
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Snap-on Incorporated vs Graco Inc.
Snap-on Incorporated or Comfort Systems USA, Inc.: Who Leads in Yearly Revenue?
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Snap-on Incorporated vs CNH Industrial N.V.
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Snap-on Incorporated and AECOM's Expenses
Cost of Revenue Trends: Snap-on Incorporated vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Snap-on Incorporated vs Saia, Inc.
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Snap-on Incorporated and U-Haul Holding Company
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Snap-on Incorporated and Pool Corporation's Expenses
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Snap-on Incorporated and Curtiss-Wright Corporation
A Side-by-Side Analysis of EBITDA: Snap-on Incorporated and Comfort Systems USA, Inc.