__timestamp | RB Global, Inc. | Snap-on Incorporated |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 57884000 | 1693400000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 56026000 | 1704500000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 66062000 | 1720800000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 79013000 | 1862000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 533397000 | 1870700000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 645816000 | 1886000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 615589000 | 1844000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 594783000 | 2141200000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 776701000 | 2311700000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1901200000 | 2488500000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 0 | 2329500000 |
Igniting the spark of knowledge
Over the past decade, the financial landscape for Snap-on Incorporated and RB Global, Inc. has undergone significant transformation. Snap-on, a leader in the tool manufacturing industry, has consistently maintained a higher cost of revenue compared to RB Global, a key player in the auction and asset management sector. From 2014 to 2023, Snap-on's cost of revenue increased by approximately 47%, peaking in 2023. In contrast, RB Global experienced a staggering 3,200% rise in the same period, highlighting its rapid growth trajectory.
Snap-on Incorporated or RB Global, Inc.: Who Leads in Yearly Revenue?
Cost of Revenue Trends: Snap-on Incorporated vs J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Snap-on Incorporated vs Carlisle Companies Incorporated
Snap-on Incorporated vs Pentair plc: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Snap-on Incorporated and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation's Expenses
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Snap-on Incorporated vs Owens Corning
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Snap-on Incorporated and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Snap-on Incorporated vs IDEX Corporation
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Snap-on Incorporated and RB Global, Inc.
Professional EBITDA Benchmarking: Snap-on Incorporated vs RB Global, Inc.