__timestamp | Deere & Company | Graco Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 3284400000 | 303565000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 2873300000 | 324016000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 2763700000 | 341734000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 3066600000 | 372496000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 3455500000 | 382988000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 3551000000 | 367743000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 3477000000 | 355796000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 3383000000 | 422975000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 3863000000 | 404731000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 3601000000 | 432156000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 4507000000 | 465133000 |
Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data
In the ever-evolving landscape of industrial manufacturing, effective cost management is crucial. Deere & Company and Graco Inc., two giants in their respective fields, have demonstrated distinct strategies in managing their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses over the past decade. From 2014 to 2024, Deere & Company has seen a steady increase in SG&A expenses, peaking in 2024 with a 37% rise from 2014. In contrast, Graco Inc. has maintained a more consistent trajectory, with a 53% increase over the same period. This divergence highlights the varying approaches to cost management, with Deere & Company potentially investing more in growth initiatives, while Graco Inc. focuses on efficiency. As we look to the future, understanding these trends offers valuable insights into the strategic priorities of these industry leaders.
Breaking Down Revenue Trends: Deere & Company vs Graco Inc.
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Deere & Company vs Graco Inc.
Deere & Company and Graco Inc.: A Detailed Gross Profit Analysis
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Deere & Company vs XPO Logistics, Inc. Trends and Insights
Who Prioritizes Innovation? R&D Spending Compared for Deere & Company and Graco Inc.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Deere & Company vs AECOM
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Deere & Company or Saia, Inc.
Comparative EBITDA Analysis: Deere & Company vs Graco Inc.