__timestamp | Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. | Snap-on Incorporated |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 38125000 | 1047900000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 41990000 | 1009100000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 41763000 | 1001400000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 44290000 | 1101300000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 45346000 | 1080700000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 44002000 | 1071500000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 18436000 | 1054800000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 16026000 | 1202300000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 24293000 | 1181200000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 27913000 | 1249000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 33331000 | 0 |
In pursuit of knowledge
In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, effective cost management is crucial for maintaining profitability. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two industry giants: Snap-on Incorporated and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc., from 2014 to 2023.
Snap-on has demonstrated a consistent upward trend in SG&A expenses, peaking in 2023 with a 25% increase from 2014. This growth reflects strategic investments in operations and marketing, crucial for sustaining its competitive edge in the automotive tools sector.
Conversely, Expeditors International experienced a 27% decline in SG&A expenses over the same period, with a notable dip in 2020. This reduction highlights the company's efficiency improvements and cost-cutting measures, aligning with its logistics and freight-forwarding business model.
Understanding these trends offers valuable insights into each company's financial strategies, providing a benchmark for industry peers.
Revenue Showdown: Snap-on Incorporated vs Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Snap-on Incorporated and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
Gross Profit Trends Compared: Snap-on Incorporated vs Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
Snap-on Incorporated and IDEX Corporation: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Snap-on Incorporated vs Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation: SG&A Expense Trends
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Snap-on Incorporated vs Carlisle Companies Incorporated
Snap-on Incorporated vs Owens Corning: SG&A Expense Trends
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Snap-on Incorporated vs China Eastern Airlines Corporation Limited
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Snap-on Incorporated and Pentair plc
Snap-on Incorporated and Textron Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
A Professional Review of EBITDA: Snap-on Incorporated Compared to Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.