Cost of Revenue Comparison: ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. vs Dyne Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotech Cost Dynamics: ACADIA vs. Dyne

__timestampACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.Dyne Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014606020001145000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015763690002028000000
Friday, January 1, 201644060002281000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017130600002932000000
Monday, January 1, 20181833000024000
Tuesday, January 1, 201919598000271000
Wednesday, January 1, 202020550000700000
Friday, January 1, 2021191410001088000
Saturday, January 1, 2022101660003345000
Sunday, January 1, 2023457310002461000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the dynamic world of biotechnology, understanding cost structures is crucial. ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Dyne Therapeutics, Inc. offer a fascinating comparison. Over the past decade, ACADIA's cost of revenue has fluctuated, peaking in 2015 with a 76% increase from the previous year. In contrast, Dyne Therapeutics experienced a dramatic 99% drop in 2018, highlighting the volatility in biotech operations.

Key Insights

  • ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.: From 2014 to 2023, ACADIA's cost of revenue saw a significant decline of approximately 25%, reflecting strategic cost management.
  • Dyne Therapeutics, Inc.: Despite a high cost of revenue in the early years, Dyne's costs plummeted by 99% in 2018, indicating a shift in operational focus or strategy.

This comparison underscores the importance of strategic financial planning in the biotech sector, where innovation and cost efficiency must go hand in hand.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025