Cost of Revenue Comparison: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. vs Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)

AMD vs Ericsson: A Decade of Cost Dynamics

__timestampAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc.Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)
Wednesday, January 1, 20143667000000145556000000
Thursday, January 1, 20152911000000161101000000
Friday, January 1, 20163316000000156243000000
Sunday, January 1, 20173466000000156758000000
Monday, January 1, 20184028000000142638000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193863000000142392000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20205416000000138666000000
Friday, January 1, 20218505000000131565000000
Saturday, January 1, 202211550000000158251000000
Sunday, January 1, 202312220000000161749000000
Monday, January 1, 202413060000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) stand as titans in their respective fields. Over the past decade, from 2014 to 2023, these companies have showcased contrasting trajectories in their cost of revenue.

AMD's Ascendancy

AMD, a leader in semiconductor innovation, has seen its cost of revenue grow by approximately 233% over this period. Starting at $3.67 billion in 2014, it surged to $12.22 billion by 2023, reflecting its aggressive expansion and increased production capabilities.

Ericsson's Steady Course

Conversely, Ericsson, a pioneer in telecommunications, maintained a relatively stable cost of revenue, fluctuating around the $140 billion mark. This stability underscores its established market presence and consistent operational efficiency.

Conclusion

This comparison highlights the dynamic nature of the tech industry, where growth strategies and market demands shape financial outcomes. As AMD continues its upward trajectory, Ericsson's steady course remains a testament to its enduring legacy.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025