Cost of Revenue Comparison: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.

Cost Trends: Applied Materials vs. Broadridge Financial (2014-2024)

__timestampApplied Materials, Inc.Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201452290000001761400000
Thursday, January 1, 201557070000001828200000
Friday, January 1, 201663140000001975900000
Sunday, January 1, 201780050000003109600000
Monday, January 1, 201894360000003169600000
Tuesday, January 1, 201982220000003131900000
Wednesday, January 1, 202095100000003265100000
Friday, January 1, 2021121490000003570800000
Saturday, January 1, 2022137920000004116900000
Sunday, January 1, 2023141330000004275500000
Monday, January 1, 2024142790000004572900000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

A Decade of Cost Dynamics: Applied Materials vs. Broadridge Financial

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology and financial services, understanding cost structures is pivotal. Over the past decade, from 2014 to 2024, Applied Materials, Inc. and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. have showcased distinct trajectories in their cost of revenue.

Applied Materials, a leader in materials engineering solutions, has seen its cost of revenue surge by approximately 173%, from $5.2 billion in 2014 to an estimated $14.3 billion in 2024. This growth reflects its expanding operations and increased demand for its cutting-edge technologies.

Conversely, Broadridge Financial, a key player in financial technology, experienced a more modest increase of around 160%, with costs rising from $1.8 billion to $4.6 billion over the same period. This steady growth underscores its strategic investments in digital transformation and client services.

These trends highlight the contrasting yet dynamic nature of cost management in two distinct sectors, offering valuable insights for investors and industry analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025