Cost of Revenue Comparison: Emerson Electric Co. vs Global Payments Inc.

Emerson vs. Global Payments: A Decade of Cost Dynamics

__timestampEmerson Electric Co.Global Payments Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014143790000001022107000
Thursday, January 1, 2015132560000001147639000
Friday, January 1, 201682600000001603532000
Sunday, January 1, 201788600000001928037000
Monday, January 1, 201899480000001095014000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019105570000002073803000
Wednesday, January 1, 202097760000003650727000
Friday, January 1, 2021106730000003773725000
Saturday, January 1, 2022114410000003778617000
Sunday, January 1, 202377380000003727521000
Monday, January 1, 202496840000003760116000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of industrial and financial sectors, Emerson Electric Co. and Global Payments Inc. stand as titans. Over the past decade, Emerson Electric Co. has consistently maintained a higher cost of revenue compared to Global Payments Inc., reflecting its expansive operations in the industrial sector. From 2014 to 2023, Emerson's cost of revenue fluctuated, peaking in 2014 and 2015, before experiencing a dip in 2023. In contrast, Global Payments Inc. has shown a steady increase, with its cost of revenue more than tripling from 2014 to 2023. This growth underscores the company's expanding footprint in the financial services industry. Notably, 2024 data for Global Payments Inc. is missing, leaving room for speculation on its future trajectory. This comparison highlights the dynamic nature of these industries and the strategic maneuvers companies must make to stay competitive.

A Decade of Financial Dynamics

Explore how two industry leaders navigate their financial landscapes.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025