Cost of Revenue Comparison: Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. vs BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotech Cost Battle: Halozyme vs. BioCryst

__timestampBioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201412200022732000
Thursday, January 1, 2015189600029245000
Friday, January 1, 2016269900033206000
Sunday, January 1, 2017170200031152000
Monday, January 1, 201847100010136000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019410100045546000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020167600043367000
Friday, January 1, 2021726400081413000
Saturday, January 1, 20226594000139304000
Sunday, January 1, 20234661000192361000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Biotech Companies

In the competitive world of biotechnology, understanding cost structures is crucial for investors and stakeholders. This analysis compares the cost of revenue for Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, Halozyme consistently outpaced BioCryst, with its cost of revenue peaking at nearly $193 million in 2023, a staggering 1,500% increase from 2014. In contrast, BioCryst's costs showed a more modest growth, reaching approximately $7.3 million in 2021, before slightly declining.

This disparity highlights Halozyme's aggressive expansion and scaling strategies, while BioCryst appears to maintain a more conservative approach. Investors should consider these trends when evaluating potential growth and profitability. The data underscores the importance of strategic financial management in the biotech sector, where innovation and cost efficiency are key to long-term success.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025