Cost of Revenue Comparison: Howmet Aerospace Inc. vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

Industrial Giants' Cost Trends: A Decade of Change

__timestampHowmet Aerospace Inc.Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014103490000007235900000
Thursday, January 1, 2015101040000007099800000
Friday, January 1, 201698060000007139700000
Sunday, January 1, 2017103570000007969200000
Monday, January 1, 2018113970000009080500000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019112270000009636700000
Wednesday, January 1, 202038780000009566700000
Friday, January 1, 2021359600000010423000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022410300000012663300000
Sunday, January 1, 2023477300000011683100000
Monday, January 1, 2024511900000010851300000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

A Tale of Two Giants: Howmet Aerospace vs. Stanley Black & Decker

In the ever-evolving landscape of industrial manufacturing, Howmet Aerospace Inc. and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. stand as titans. Over the past decade, these companies have showcased contrasting trajectories in their cost of revenue. From 2014 to 2023, Howmet Aerospace experienced a significant decline, with costs dropping by over 50%, from approximately $10 billion to $4.8 billion. This reduction reflects strategic shifts and operational efficiencies. In contrast, Stanley Black & Decker saw a steady increase, peaking at $12.7 billion in 2022, a 75% rise from 2014. This growth underscores their expanding market footprint and robust demand. The year 2020 marked a pivotal point for Howmet, with costs plummeting to $3.9 billion, likely due to global disruptions. Meanwhile, Stanley Black & Decker's resilience shone through, maintaining upward momentum. This comparison highlights the dynamic nature of industrial giants adapting to global challenges.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025