Cost of Revenue Comparison: Intel Corporation vs Teradyne, Inc.

Intel vs. Teradyne: A Decade of Cost Dynamics

__timestampIntel CorporationTeradyne, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201420261000000769016000
Thursday, January 1, 201520676000000723935000
Friday, January 1, 201623196000000793683000
Sunday, January 1, 201723692000000912734000
Monday, January 1, 201827111000000880408000
Tuesday, January 1, 201929825000000955136000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020342550000001335728000
Friday, January 1, 2021352090000001496225000
Saturday, January 1, 2022361880000001287894000
Sunday, January 1, 2023325170000001139550000
Monday, January 1, 2024357560000001170953000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Cost of Revenue: Intel vs. Teradyne

In the ever-evolving tech industry, understanding cost structures is crucial for investors and analysts. Over the past decade, Intel Corporation and Teradyne, Inc. have showcased contrasting cost of revenue trends. From 2014 to 2023, Intel's cost of revenue surged by approximately 60%, peaking in 2022. This reflects Intel's aggressive expansion and investment in cutting-edge technologies. In contrast, Teradyne's cost of revenue grew by about 48% during the same period, indicating a more measured approach to scaling operations.

Key Insights

  • Intel's Growth: Intel's cost of revenue increased from $20 billion in 2014 to over $36 billion in 2022, highlighting its commitment to maintaining a competitive edge.
  • Teradyne's Strategy: Teradyne's cost of revenue, while significantly lower, rose from $724 million in 2015 to nearly $1.5 billion in 2021, reflecting strategic investments in automation and testing solutions.

These trends underscore the distinct strategies of these tech giants in navigating the competitive landscape.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025