Cost of Revenue Comparison: Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc vs ADMA Biologics, Inc.

Biopharma Cost Dynamics: Jazz vs. ADMA

__timestampADMA Biologics, Inc.Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc
Wednesday, January 1, 20143742367117418000
Thursday, January 1, 20154311461102526000
Friday, January 1, 20166360761105386000
Sunday, January 1, 201729164321110188000
Monday, January 1, 201842194635121544000
Tuesday, January 1, 201939504238127930000
Wednesday, January 1, 202061291426148917000
Friday, January 1, 202179769341440760000
Saturday, January 1, 2022118814535540517000
Sunday, January 1, 2023169273000435577000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Biopharma Giants

In the competitive landscape of biopharmaceuticals, understanding cost structures is crucial. Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc and ADMA Biologics, Inc. have shown distinct trajectories in their cost of revenue from 2014 to 2023. Jazz Pharmaceuticals, a leader in the field, consistently maintained higher costs, peaking in 2022 with a 540% increase from 2014. This reflects their expansive operations and robust product pipeline. Meanwhile, ADMA Biologics, a smaller player, exhibited a staggering 4,400% rise in costs over the same period, highlighting their aggressive growth strategy and increased production capabilities.

Key Insights

  • Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Despite fluctuations, their cost of revenue remained significantly higher, indicating a stable yet expansive business model.
  • ADMA Biologics: The sharp increase in costs suggests rapid scaling and potential market expansion.

This comparison underscores the diverse strategies within the biopharma sector, offering insights into operational efficiencies and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025