Cost of Revenue Comparison: Lockheed Martin Corporation vs 3M Company

Lockheed vs 3M: A Decade of Revenue Dynamics

__timestamp3M CompanyLockheed Martin Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20141644700000040226000000
Thursday, January 1, 20151538300000040830000000
Friday, January 1, 20161504000000042106000000
Sunday, January 1, 20171600100000045500000000
Monday, January 1, 20181668200000046392000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191713600000051445000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201660500000056744000000
Friday, January 1, 20211879500000057983000000
Saturday, January 1, 20221923200000057697000000
Sunday, January 1, 20231847700000059092000000
Monday, January 1, 20241444700000064113000000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of American industry, Lockheed Martin Corporation and 3M Company stand as titans in their respective fields. From 2014 to 2024, these companies have showcased contrasting trajectories in their cost of revenue. Lockheed Martin, a leader in aerospace and defense, has seen a robust increase of approximately 60% in its cost of revenue, reflecting its expanding operations and strategic investments. In contrast, 3M, a diversified technology company, experienced a more modest growth of around 10% over the same period.

A Decade of Change

By 2023, Lockheed Martin's cost of revenue surged to nearly four times that of 3M, highlighting its aggressive growth strategy. Meanwhile, 3M's cost of revenue peaked in 2022, before a notable decline in 2024, suggesting a strategic shift or market adaptation. This comparison underscores the dynamic nature of these industries and the strategic decisions that shape their financial landscapes.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025