Cost of Revenue Comparison: Marvell Technology, Inc. vs Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.

Cost of Revenue Trends: Marvell vs. Broadridge (2014-2024)

__timestampBroadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.Marvell Technology, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201417614000001654230000
Thursday, January 1, 201518282000001843706000
Friday, January 1, 201619759000001494736000
Sunday, January 1, 201731096000001029527000
Monday, January 1, 20183169600000947230000
Tuesday, January 1, 201931319000001407399000
Wednesday, January 1, 202032651000001342220000
Friday, January 1, 202135708000001480550000
Saturday, January 1, 202241169000002398158000
Sunday, January 1, 202342755000002932100000
Monday, January 1, 202445729000003214100000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

A Decade of Cost Dynamics: Marvell Technology vs. Broadridge Financial

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology and financial services, understanding cost structures is pivotal. Over the past decade, Marvell Technology, Inc. and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. have showcased distinct trajectories in their cost of revenue. From 2014 to 2024, Broadridge's cost of revenue surged by approximately 160%, reflecting its expanding operations and market reach. In contrast, Marvell Technology experienced a 94% increase, indicating strategic investments and scaling in the tech sector.

Key Insights

  • Broadridge Financial Solutions: Starting at $1.76 billion in 2014, Broadridge's cost of revenue reached $4.57 billion by 2024, highlighting its robust growth in financial services.
  • Marvell Technology: From $1.65 billion in 2014, Marvell's cost of revenue climbed to $3.21 billion in 2024, underscoring its commitment to innovation and market expansion.

These trends offer a window into the strategic priorities and market dynamics of these industry leaders.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025