Cost of Revenue Comparison: Merck & Co., Inc. vs ADMA Biologics, Inc.

Merck vs. ADMA: A Decade of Cost Dynamics

__timestampADMA Biologics, Inc.Merck & Co., Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014374236716768000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015431146114934000000
Friday, January 1, 2016636076113891000000
Sunday, January 1, 20172916432112775000000
Monday, January 1, 20184219463513509000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193950423814112000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206129142613618000000
Friday, January 1, 20217976934113626000000
Saturday, January 1, 202211881453517411000000
Sunday, January 1, 202316927300016126000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

A Tale of Two Companies: Cost of Revenue Analysis

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical landscape, understanding cost dynamics is crucial. This analysis juxtaposes the cost of revenue for Merck & Co., Inc. and ADMA Biologics, Inc. from 2014 to 2023. Merck, a titan in the industry, consistently reported costs in the range of $13 billion to $17 billion annually. In contrast, ADMA Biologics, a smaller player, saw its costs rise from $3.7 million in 2014 to $169 million in 2023, marking a staggering 4,400% increase. This growth reflects ADMA's aggressive expansion and scaling efforts. Meanwhile, Merck's costs remained relatively stable, showcasing its mature market position. The data highlights the contrasting growth trajectories and operational scales of these two companies, offering insights into their strategic priorities and market challenges. As the pharmaceutical sector continues to innovate, such financial insights are invaluable for investors and industry analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025