Cost of Revenue Comparison: Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. vs Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biopharma Cost Dynamics: Amneal vs. Neurocrine

__timestampAmneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201433598900014400000
Thursday, January 1, 201536705400033800000
Friday, January 1, 201642077000035900000
Sunday, January 1, 20175074760001254000
Monday, January 1, 20189465880004889000
Tuesday, January 1, 201912733760007400000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020136413000010100000
Friday, January 1, 2021132469600014300000
Saturday, January 1, 2022142759600023200000
Sunday, January 1, 2023157304200039700000
Monday, January 1, 202434000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Biopharma Giants

In the competitive landscape of biopharmaceuticals, understanding cost structures is crucial. From 2014 to 2023, Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. have shown contrasting trajectories in their cost of revenue. Amneal's cost of revenue surged by approximately 368%, peaking at $1.57 billion in 2023. This reflects their aggressive expansion and market penetration strategies. In contrast, Neurocrine's cost of revenue, though significantly lower, increased by nearly 176%, reaching $39.7 million in 2023. This indicates a more controlled growth approach, focusing on niche markets. The data highlights the diverse strategies employed by these companies in navigating the biopharma sector. As investors and stakeholders analyze these trends, the insights offer a window into the operational efficiencies and market strategies of these industry players.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025