Cost of Revenue Comparison: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. vs Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.

Biotech Giants' Cost of Revenue: A Decade in Review

__timestampNeurocrine Biosciences, Inc.Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201414400000205018000
Thursday, January 1, 201533800000392709000
Friday, January 1, 201635900000299694000
Sunday, January 1, 20171254000397061000
Monday, January 1, 20184889000434100000
Tuesday, January 1, 20197400000782200000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020101000001119900000
Friday, January 1, 2021143000002437500000
Saturday, January 1, 2022232000001560400000
Sunday, January 1, 2023397000001815800000
Monday, January 1, 2024340000001970500000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Biotech Giants

In the competitive world of biotechnology, understanding cost structures is crucial. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. offer a fascinating comparison. Over the past decade, Regeneron's cost of revenue has consistently dwarfed that of Neurocrine, peaking in 2021 at nearly 2.44 billion, a staggering 6,000% higher than Neurocrine's 39.7 million in 2023. This disparity highlights Regeneron's expansive operations and market reach. Neurocrine, while smaller, has shown a steady increase in its cost of revenue, growing by approximately 175% from 2014 to 2023. This growth reflects its strategic investments and scaling efforts. The data underscores the diverse strategies these companies employ to navigate the biotech landscape, with Regeneron focusing on large-scale operations and Neurocrine on targeted growth. As the industry evolves, these insights provide a window into the financial dynamics shaping biotech's future.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025