Cost of Revenue Comparison: Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. vs Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biopharma Cost Dynamics: Amneal vs. Sarepta

__timestampAmneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201433598900094103000
Thursday, January 1, 2015367054000146194000
Friday, January 1, 2016420770000130000
Sunday, January 1, 20175074760007353000
Monday, January 1, 201894658800034193000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019127337600056586000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020136413000063382000
Friday, January 1, 2021132469600097049000
Saturday, January 1, 20221427596000139989000
Sunday, January 1, 20231573042000150343000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Biopharma Giants

In the competitive landscape of biopharmaceuticals, understanding cost structures is crucial. This analysis compares the cost of revenue for Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. and Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, Amneal Pharmaceuticals consistently reported higher costs, peaking at approximately $1.57 billion in 2023, a staggering 367% increase from 2014. In contrast, Sarepta Therapeutics, while showing growth, maintained a more modest cost structure, with a 60% increase over the same period, reaching around $150 million in 2023.

This disparity highlights differing business models and market strategies. Amneal's higher costs may reflect a broader product portfolio or aggressive market expansion, while Sarepta's leaner cost structure could indicate a focus on niche markets or innovative therapies. As the biopharma industry evolves, these insights offer a glimpse into the strategic decisions shaping the future of healthcare.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025