Cost of Revenue Comparison: Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. vs BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotech Cost Dynamics: Sarepta vs. BioCryst

__timestampBioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201412200094103000
Thursday, January 1, 20151896000146194000
Friday, January 1, 20162699000130000
Sunday, January 1, 201717020007353000
Monday, January 1, 201847100034193000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019410100056586000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020167600063382000
Friday, January 1, 2021726400097049000
Saturday, January 1, 20226594000139989000
Sunday, January 1, 20234661000150343000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive landscape of biotechnology, understanding cost structures is crucial. This chart compares the cost of revenue for Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, Sarepta consistently outpaced BioCryst, with costs peaking at approximately $150 million in 2023, a staggering 1,230% increase from its 2016 low. In contrast, BioCryst's costs remained relatively stable, with a notable peak in 2021 at $7.3 million, reflecting a 5,857% increase from 2014. This disparity highlights Sarepta's aggressive growth strategy, likely driven by its focus on developing treatments for rare diseases. Meanwhile, BioCryst's steadier cost trajectory suggests a more conservative approach. These trends offer insights into each company's operational strategies and market positioning, providing a window into the financial dynamics of the biotech sector.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025