Cost of Revenue Comparison: Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. vs HUTCHMED (China) Limited

Biotech Giants' Cost Strategies: A Decade in Review

__timestampHUTCHMED (China) LimitedSarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20147204900094103000
Thursday, January 1, 2015110777000146194000
Friday, January 1, 2016156328000130000
Sunday, January 1, 20171758200007353000
Monday, January 1, 201814394400034193000
Tuesday, January 1, 201916015200056586000
Wednesday, January 1, 202018851900063382000
Friday, January 1, 202125823400097049000
Saturday, January 1, 2022311103000139989000
Sunday, January 1, 2023384447000150343000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Biotech Giants

In the ever-evolving world of biotechnology, cost management is crucial for sustaining growth and innovation. This chart provides a fascinating comparison of the cost of revenue for two prominent players: Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. and HUTCHMED (China) Limited over the past decade.

From 2014 to 2023, HUTCHMED's cost of revenue surged by over 430%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and increased production capabilities. In contrast, Sarepta's cost of revenue grew by approximately 60%, indicating a more measured approach to scaling operations. Notably, HUTCHMED's cost of revenue consistently outpaced Sarepta's, peaking at nearly 2.6 times higher in 2023.

This divergence highlights the strategic differences between the two companies. While HUTCHMED focuses on rapid growth, Sarepta appears to prioritize efficiency and cost control. As the biotech landscape continues to shift, these strategies will undoubtedly shape their future trajectories.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025