Cost of Revenue Comparison: Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. vs Pharming Group N.V.

Biotech Giants: Cost of Revenue Battle Unveiled

__timestampPharming Group N.V.Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014416727494103000
Thursday, January 1, 20155247851146194000
Friday, January 1, 20164925118130000
Sunday, January 1, 2017149302977353000
Monday, January 1, 20182537176834193000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192392127456586000
Wednesday, January 1, 20202533823663382000
Friday, January 1, 20212018296697049000
Saturday, January 1, 202217562000139989000
Sunday, January 1, 202325212000150343000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, cost management is crucial for success. This analysis compares the cost of revenue for two prominent companies: Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. and Pharming Group N.V. over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Sarepta Therapeutics consistently outpaced Pharming Group in terms of cost of revenue, with a peak in 2023 where Sarepta's costs were nearly six times higher than Pharming's. This trend highlights Sarepta's aggressive investment in research and development, a common strategy in the biotech sector to drive innovation and growth. Meanwhile, Pharming Group maintained a more stable cost structure, reflecting a different strategic approach. Understanding these financial dynamics provides valuable insights into each company's operational strategies and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025