Cost of Revenue Comparison: Splunk Inc. vs Teradyne, Inc.

Splunk vs. Teradyne: A Decade of Cost Dynamics

__timestampSplunk Inc.Teradyne, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201435825000769016000
Thursday, January 1, 201568378000723935000
Friday, January 1, 2016114122000793683000
Sunday, January 1, 2017191053000912734000
Monday, January 1, 2018256409000880408000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019344676000955136000
Wednesday, January 1, 20204297880001335728000
Friday, January 1, 20215473450001496225000
Saturday, January 1, 20227339690001287894000
Sunday, January 1, 20238159950001139550000
Monday, January 1, 20248655070001170953000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Companies

In the ever-evolving tech landscape, understanding cost efficiency is crucial. Splunk Inc. and Teradyne, Inc. offer a fascinating study in contrasts. From 2014 to 2023, Splunk's cost of revenue surged by over 2,300%, reflecting its rapid growth and expansion. Meanwhile, Teradyne's costs increased by approximately 48%, showcasing a more stable trajectory.

A Decade of Change

Splunk's cost of revenue grew from a modest 36 million in 2014 to an impressive 866 million by 2023, highlighting its aggressive market penetration. Teradyne, on the other hand, peaked in 2021 with a cost of 1.5 billion, before a slight decline. This divergence underscores the different strategies and market conditions faced by these tech giants.

Missing Data Insights

Interestingly, 2024 data for Teradyne is missing, leaving room for speculation on its future cost strategies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025