Cost of Revenue Comparison: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited vs HUTCHMED (China) Limited

Teva vs. HUTCHMED: A Decade of Cost Dynamics

__timestampHUTCHMED (China) LimitedTeva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited
Wednesday, January 1, 2014720490009216000000
Thursday, January 1, 20151107770008296000000
Friday, January 1, 201615632800010044000000
Sunday, January 1, 201717582000011560000000
Monday, January 1, 201814394400010558000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191601520009351000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201885190008933000000
Friday, January 1, 20212582340008284000000
Saturday, January 1, 20223111030007952000000
Sunday, January 1, 20233844470008200000000
Monday, January 1, 20248480000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Pharmaceutical Giants

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical industry, understanding cost structures is crucial for investors and stakeholders. This analysis compares the cost of revenue for Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited and HUTCHMED (China) Limited from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, Teva's cost of revenue consistently dwarfed that of HUTCHMED, averaging around 9.2 billion annually, while HUTCHMED's figures hovered around 196 million.

Key Insights

  • Teva's Dominance: Teva's cost of revenue peaked in 2017, reaching approximately 11.6 billion, reflecting its expansive operations and market reach.
  • HUTCHMED's Growth: Despite being smaller, HUTCHMED showed a remarkable growth trajectory, with its cost of revenue increasing by over 400% from 2014 to 2023.
  • Market Dynamics: The data highlights the contrasting scales and strategies of these companies, with Teva focusing on volume and HUTCHMED on strategic growth.

This comparison underscores the diverse approaches within the pharmaceutical sector, offering valuable insights for market analysts and investors.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025