__timestamp | Xencor, Inc. | Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 18516000 | 5903000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 34140000 | 2762000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 51872000 | 1114000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 71772000 | 25573000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 97501000 | 6000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 118590000 | 38845000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 169802000 | 50523000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 7491000 | 75463000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 8799000 | 105767000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 253598000 | 167512000 |
Unlocking the unknown
In the dynamic world of biotechnology, cost management is crucial for sustaining innovation. This chart compares the cost of revenue for Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Xencor, Inc. over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Xencor, Inc. has seen a staggering increase of over 1,270% in its cost of revenue, peaking at approximately $254 million in 2023. In contrast, Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc. experienced a more moderate rise of around 2,740%, reaching about $168 million in the same year.
This data highlights the contrasting financial strategies and growth trajectories of these two biotech leaders, offering valuable insights for investors and industry analysts.
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Novo Nordisk A/S vs Xencor, Inc.
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Merck & Co., Inc. vs Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cost of Revenue Trends: Incyte Corporation vs Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cost of Revenue Trends: Cytokinetics, Incorporated vs Xencor, Inc.
Cost of Revenue Trends: ADMA Biologics, Inc. vs Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: CRISPR Therapeutics AG vs Xencor, Inc.
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Bausch Health Companies Inc.
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s Expenses
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Xencor, Inc.
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Xencor, Inc.
Xencor, Inc. vs MiMedx Group, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored