Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Applied Materials, Inc. and Marvell Technology, Inc.

Cost Trends: Applied Materials vs. Marvell Technology

__timestampApplied Materials, Inc.Marvell Technology, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201452290000001654230000
Thursday, January 1, 201557070000001843706000
Friday, January 1, 201663140000001494736000
Sunday, January 1, 201780050000001029527000
Monday, January 1, 20189436000000947230000
Tuesday, January 1, 201982220000001407399000
Wednesday, January 1, 202095100000001342220000
Friday, January 1, 2021121490000001480550000
Saturday, January 1, 2022137920000002398158000
Sunday, January 1, 2023141330000002932100000
Monday, January 1, 2024142790000003214100000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

A Decade of Cost Dynamics: Applied Materials vs. Marvell Technology

In the ever-evolving semiconductor industry, understanding cost structures is crucial. Over the past decade, Applied Materials, Inc. and Marvell Technology, Inc. have showcased distinct cost of revenue trends. From 2014 to 2024, Applied Materials saw a robust 173% increase in its cost of revenue, peaking at approximately $14.3 billion in 2024. This reflects its aggressive expansion and scaling strategies. In contrast, Marvell Technology's cost of revenue grew by 94%, reaching around $3.2 billion in 2024, indicating a more measured growth approach.

The data reveals that while both companies have increased their spending, Applied Materials' cost growth outpaces Marvell's, highlighting its larger operational scale. This divergence in cost trends underscores the different strategic paths these tech giants have taken in the competitive semiconductor landscape. As the industry continues to innovate, monitoring these financial metrics will be key to understanding future market dynamics.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025