__timestamp | Applied Materials, Inc. | Marvell Technology, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 5229000000 | 1654230000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 5707000000 | 1843706000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 6314000000 | 1494736000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 8005000000 | 1029527000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 9436000000 | 947230000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 8222000000 | 1407399000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 9510000000 | 1342220000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 12149000000 | 1480550000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 13792000000 | 2398158000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 14133000000 | 2932100000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 14279000000 | 3214100000 |
Infusing magic into the data realm
In the ever-evolving semiconductor industry, understanding cost structures is crucial. Over the past decade, Applied Materials, Inc. and Marvell Technology, Inc. have showcased distinct cost of revenue trends. From 2014 to 2024, Applied Materials saw a robust 173% increase in its cost of revenue, peaking at approximately $14.3 billion in 2024. This reflects its aggressive expansion and scaling strategies. In contrast, Marvell Technology's cost of revenue grew by 94%, reaching around $3.2 billion in 2024, indicating a more measured growth approach.
The data reveals that while both companies have increased their spending, Applied Materials' cost growth outpaces Marvell's, highlighting its larger operational scale. This divergence in cost trends underscores the different strategic paths these tech giants have taken in the competitive semiconductor landscape. As the industry continues to innovate, monitoring these financial metrics will be key to understanding future market dynamics.
Who Generates More Revenue? Applied Materials, Inc. or Marvell Technology, Inc.
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Applied Materials, Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc.
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Lam Research Corporation
Cost of Revenue Trends: Applied Materials, Inc. vs KLA Corporation
Cost of Revenue Trends: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Intel Corporation
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Applied Materials, Inc. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Applied Materials, Inc. and MicroStrategy Incorporated's Expenses
Applied Materials, Inc. vs Marvell Technology, Inc.: A Gross Profit Performance Breakdown
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Applied Materials, Inc. and Amphenol Corporation
Applied Materials, Inc. or Marvell Technology, Inc.: Who Invests More in Innovation?
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Applied Materials, Inc. and Marvell Technology, Inc.