Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Salesforce, Inc. and Applied Materials, Inc.

Comparative Cost Analysis: Salesforce vs. Applied Materials

__timestampApplied Materials, Inc.Salesforce, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20145229000000968428000
Thursday, January 1, 201557070000001289270000
Friday, January 1, 201663140000001654548000
Sunday, January 1, 201780050000002234000000
Monday, January 1, 201894360000002773000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201982220000003451000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202095100000004235000000
Friday, January 1, 2021121490000005438000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022137920000007026000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023141330000008360000000
Monday, January 1, 2024142790000008541000000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Cost of Revenue: A Comparative Analysis of Salesforce, Inc. and Applied Materials, Inc.

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology and manufacturing, understanding the cost of revenue is crucial for assessing a company's financial health. Over the past decade, from 2014 to 2024, Applied Materials, Inc. and Salesforce, Inc. have shown distinct trends in their cost of revenue, reflecting their strategic priorities and market dynamics.

Applied Materials, Inc., a leader in materials engineering solutions, has seen its cost of revenue grow by approximately 173% from 2014 to 2024. This increase underscores the company's expansion and investment in cutting-edge technologies. In contrast, Salesforce, Inc., a pioneer in cloud-based software, has experienced a staggering 782% rise in its cost of revenue over the same period, highlighting its aggressive growth strategy and market penetration.

These trends offer valuable insights into how these industry giants allocate resources to maintain their competitive edge in a rapidly changing market.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025