Cost of Revenue Trends: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. vs Electronic Arts Inc.

AMD vs EA: A Decade of Cost Dynamics

__timestampAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc.Electronic Arts Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201436670000001347000000
Thursday, January 1, 201529110000001429000000
Friday, January 1, 201633160000001354000000
Sunday, January 1, 201734660000001298000000
Monday, January 1, 201840280000001277000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201938630000001322000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202054160000001369000000
Friday, January 1, 202185050000001494000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022115500000001859000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023122200000001792000000
Monday, January 1, 2024130600000001710000000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Cost of Revenue Trends: AMD vs EA

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology and entertainment, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) and Electronic Arts Inc. (EA) have carved distinct paths. Over the past decade, AMD's cost of revenue has surged by over 230%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and innovation in the semiconductor industry. In contrast, EA's cost of revenue has remained relatively stable, with a modest increase of around 27% since 2014, highlighting its steady approach in the gaming sector.

From 2014 to 2023, AMD's cost of revenue grew from approximately $3.7 billion to $12.2 billion, showcasing its strategic investments in cutting-edge technology. Meanwhile, EA's cost of revenue rose from $1.3 billion to $1.8 billion, underscoring its focus on sustainable growth. Notably, 2024 data for AMD is missing, leaving room for speculation on its future trajectory. This comparison offers a fascinating glimpse into the financial strategies of two industry giants.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025