Cost of Revenue Trends: Carlisle Companies Incorporated vs Curtiss-Wright Corporation

Cost of Revenue: Carlisle's Growth vs. Curtiss-Wright's Stability

__timestampCarlisle Companies IncorporatedCurtiss-Wright Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201423845000001466610000
Thursday, January 1, 201525365000001422428000
Friday, January 1, 201625181000001358448000
Sunday, January 1, 201729419000001452431000
Monday, January 1, 201833048000001540574000
Tuesday, January 1, 201934399000001589216000
Wednesday, January 1, 202028325000001550109000
Friday, January 1, 202134956000001572575000
Saturday, January 1, 202244345000001602416000
Sunday, January 1, 202330429000001778195000
Monday, January 1, 202431159000001967640000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Analyzing Cost of Revenue Trends: Carlisle vs. Curtiss-Wright

In the ever-evolving landscape of industrial manufacturing, understanding cost dynamics is crucial. Over the past decade, Carlisle Companies Incorporated and Curtiss-Wright Corporation have showcased distinct trends in their cost of revenue. Carlisle, a leader in diversified manufacturing, saw a significant 86% increase in cost of revenue from 2014 to 2022, peaking in 2022 before a slight dip in 2023. This reflects their aggressive expansion and investment strategies. In contrast, Curtiss-Wright, known for its precision engineering, maintained a more stable trajectory, with a modest 21% rise over the same period, indicating a focus on efficiency and cost control.

These trends highlight the strategic differences between the two companies. While Carlisle's fluctuations suggest a dynamic growth approach, Curtiss-Wright's steadiness underscores a commitment to operational stability. As the industrial sector continues to adapt, these insights provide a window into the strategic priorities shaping the future.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025