__timestamp | Cummins Inc. | Honeywell International Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 14360000000 | 28957000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 14163000000 | 26747000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 13057000000 | 27150000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 15338000000 | 27575000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 18034000000 | 29046000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 17591000000 | 24339000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 14917000000 | 22169000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 18326000000 | 23394000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 21355000000 | 23825000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 25816000000 | 22995000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 25663000000 | 23836000000 |
Data in motion
In the ever-evolving landscape of industrial giants, Honeywell International Inc. and Cummins Inc. have consistently demonstrated their prowess. Over the past decade, from 2014 to 2023, these two titans have shown distinct trends in their cost of revenue. Honeywell, a leader in aerospace and building technologies, saw its cost of revenue peak in 2018, reaching approximately 29 billion, before experiencing a gradual decline to around 23 billion by 2023. This represents a decrease of nearly 21% over five years. In contrast, Cummins, renowned for its engines and power generation products, exhibited a robust upward trajectory. Starting at about 14 billion in 2014, Cummins' cost of revenue surged by 80% to approximately 26 billion in 2023. This divergence highlights the dynamic nature of industrial sectors and the strategic adaptations companies must undertake to thrive.
Honeywell International Inc. or Cummins Inc.: Who Leads in Yearly Revenue?
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Honeywell International Inc. and Howmet Aerospace Inc.
Cost of Revenue Trends: Honeywell International Inc. vs Axon Enterprise, Inc.
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Honeywell International Inc. and Delta Air Lines, Inc.'s Expenses
R&D Insights: How Honeywell International Inc. and Cummins Inc. Allocate Funds
Honeywell International Inc. and Cummins Inc.: A Detailed Examination of EBITDA Performance