Cost of Revenue Trends: Masco Corporation vs ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.

Masco vs. ZTO: A Decade of Cost Dynamics

__timestampMasco CorporationZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201461340000002770530000
Thursday, January 1, 201548890000003998737000
Friday, January 1, 201649010000006345899000
Sunday, January 1, 201750330000008714489000
Monday, January 1, 2018567000000012239568000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019433600000015488778000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020460100000019377184000
Friday, January 1, 2021551200000023816462000
Saturday, January 1, 2022596700000026337721000
Sunday, January 1, 2023513100000026756389000
Monday, January 1, 20244997000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Companies

In the ever-evolving landscape of global commerce, Masco Corporation and ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. present a fascinating study in contrasts. Over the past decade, Masco, a leader in home improvement and building products, has seen its cost of revenue fluctuate, peaking in 2014 and 2022. Meanwhile, ZTO Express, a titan in the logistics sector, has experienced a staggering growth trajectory, with its cost of revenue increasing nearly tenfold from 2014 to 2023.

A Decade of Change

From 2014 to 2023, Masco's cost of revenue saw a modest decline of about 16%, reflecting strategic shifts and market dynamics. In contrast, ZTO Express's cost of revenue surged by approximately 866%, underscoring its rapid expansion in the logistics industry. This divergence highlights the distinct paths these companies have taken in response to market demands and opportunities.

Key Insights

While Masco's cost management strategies have kept its expenses relatively stable, ZTO's aggressive growth strategy has led to a significant increase in its operational costs. This comparison offers valuable insights into how different industries navigate financial challenges and opportunities.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025