Cost of Revenue Trends: Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. vs HUTCHMED (China) Limited

Biopharma Cost Trends: HUTCHMED vs. Neurocrine

__timestampHUTCHMED (China) LimitedNeurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20147204900014400000
Thursday, January 1, 201511077700033800000
Friday, January 1, 201615632800035900000
Sunday, January 1, 20171758200001254000
Monday, January 1, 20181439440004889000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191601520007400000
Wednesday, January 1, 202018851900010100000
Friday, January 1, 202125823400014300000
Saturday, January 1, 202231110300023200000
Sunday, January 1, 202338444700039700000
Monday, January 1, 202434000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Cost of Revenue Trends: A Tale of Two Biopharma Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of biopharmaceuticals, understanding cost dynamics is crucial. Over the past decade, HUTCHMED (China) Limited and Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. have showcased contrasting trends in their cost of revenue. From 2014 to 2023, HUTCHMED's cost of revenue surged by over 430%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and scaling efforts in the competitive Chinese market. In contrast, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. experienced a more modest increase of approximately 175%, indicative of its strategic focus on niche markets and innovative therapies.

By 2023, HUTCHMED's cost of revenue reached nearly 10 times that of Neurocrine, highlighting the divergent paths these companies have taken. This data not only underscores the varying business strategies but also offers insights into the broader industry trends, where scale and specialization play pivotal roles in shaping financial outcomes.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025