__timestamp | C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. | Masco Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 805427000 | 899000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 924719000 | 1041000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 912200000 | 1220000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 868096000 | 1314000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1008812000 | 1240000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 890425000 | 1244000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 774995000 | 1410000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1173367000 | 1185000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1359558000 | 1490000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 613592000 | 1493000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 766301000 | 1410000000 |
In pursuit of knowledge
In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, EBITDA serves as a crucial metric for evaluating a company's operational performance. This analysis juxtaposes Masco Corporation and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., two industry giants, over a decade-long period from 2014 to 2023.
Masco Corporation has consistently outperformed C.H. Robinson in terms of EBITDA, with a notable peak in 2023, reaching approximately 1.49 billion. In contrast, C.H. Robinson's EBITDA saw a significant decline in 2023, dropping to around 613 million, a stark 55% decrease from its 2022 peak.
The data reveals a robust growth trajectory for Masco, with a 66% increase in EBITDA from 2014 to 2023. Meanwhile, C.H. Robinson's performance has been more volatile, highlighting the challenges faced in the logistics sector. This comparison underscores the resilience and strategic prowess of Masco in navigating economic fluctuations.
Comparing Revenue Performance: Masco Corporation or C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.?
Masco Corporation vs C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.: A Gross Profit Performance Breakdown
Professional EBITDA Benchmarking: Masco Corporation vs Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
Professional EBITDA Benchmarking: Masco Corporation vs Pool Corporation
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Masco Corporation vs C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. Trends and Insights
Comprehensive EBITDA Comparison: Masco Corporation vs U-Haul Holding Company
A Side-by-Side Analysis of EBITDA: Masco Corporation and Curtiss-Wright Corporation
A Side-by-Side Analysis of EBITDA: Masco Corporation and Clean Harbors, Inc.