| __timestamp | Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | Snap-on Incorporated |
|---|---|---|
| Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 531144000 | 767600000 |
| Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 520410000 | 848900000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2016 | 506120000 | 942400000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 561524000 | 971900000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2018 | 577061000 | 1057400000 |
| Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 663731000 | 1067000000 |
| Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 745424000 | 991400000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2021 | 834449000 | 1249100000 |
| Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 826865000 | 1351500000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 958150000 | 1478800000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1199992000 | 1520700000 |
Unlocking the unknown
In the competitive landscape of corporate finance, EBITDA serves as a crucial metric for evaluating a company's operational performance. From 2014 to 2023, Snap-on Incorporated consistently outperformed Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation in EBITDA, showcasing a robust growth trajectory. Snap-on's EBITDA surged by approximately 93% over this period, peaking in 2023, while Booz Allen Hamilton experienced a commendable 81% increase, reaching its highest in 2024. This comparison highlights Snap-on's superior operational efficiency and market adaptability. Notably, Snap-on's EBITDA growth was more stable, with fewer fluctuations, indicating a resilient business model. The data for 2024 is incomplete for Snap-on, suggesting potential for further analysis. As businesses navigate economic uncertainties, understanding these trends provides valuable insights into strategic financial planning and investment opportunities.
Annual Revenue Comparison: Snap-on Incorporated vs Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Snap-on Incorporated and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation's Expenses
Snap-on Incorporated vs Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation: A Gross Profit Performance Breakdown
Snap-on Incorporated vs Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation: SG&A Expense Trends
Professional EBITDA Benchmarking: Snap-on Incorporated vs RB Global, Inc.
A Side-by-Side Analysis of EBITDA: Snap-on Incorporated and IDEX Corporation
Comparative EBITDA Analysis: Snap-on Incorporated vs Carlisle Companies Incorporated
A Professional Review of EBITDA: Snap-on Incorporated Compared to Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
Comparative EBITDA Analysis: Snap-on Incorporated vs Owens Corning
A Side-by-Side Analysis of EBITDA: Snap-on Incorporated and XPO Logistics, Inc.
EBITDA Performance Review: Snap-on Incorporated vs Pentair plc
EBITDA Metrics Evaluated: Snap-on Incorporated vs Textron Inc.