__timestamp | KLA Corporation | SAP SE |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 855142000 | 5775000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 773476000 | 6163000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 1036277000 | 6429000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 1276261000 | 6331000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1599878000 | 7084000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 1620873000 | 7474000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 2104221000 | 8258000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 2851117000 | 8917000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 4012920000 | 6480000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 4406901000 | 7502000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 3906779000 | 7075000000 |
Unlocking the unknown
In the ever-evolving landscape of global technology, SAP SE and KLA Corporation have demonstrated remarkable financial trajectories over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, SAP SE consistently showcased robust EBITDA figures, peaking in 2020 with a 43% increase from 2014. Meanwhile, KLA Corporation's EBITDA surged by an impressive 415% over the same period, highlighting its dynamic growth strategy.
This comparative analysis underscores the strategic prowess of both companies, with KLA Corporation's aggressive growth contrasting SAP SE's stable expansion. Missing data for 2024 suggests ongoing developments, inviting investors to stay tuned for future updates.
Annual Revenue Comparison: SAP SE vs KLA Corporation
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: SAP SE vs KLA Corporation
Who Generates Higher Gross Profit? SAP SE or KLA Corporation
R&D Spending Showdown: SAP SE vs KLA Corporation
EBITDA Metrics Evaluated: SAP SE vs Arista Networks, Inc.
A Professional Review of EBITDA: SAP SE Compared to Fiserv, Inc.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: SAP SE vs KLA Corporation
EBITDA Performance Review: SAP SE vs Micron Technology, Inc.
Comprehensive EBITDA Comparison: SAP SE vs Analog Devices, Inc.
SAP SE and Lam Research Corporation: A Detailed Examination of EBITDA Performance
Comparative EBITDA Analysis: SAP SE vs Intel Corporation
Comprehensive EBITDA Comparison: SAP SE vs Cadence Design Systems, Inc.